Please contact us here if you are seeking a proposal for a building we don’t currently manage. If you are an existing BCsystems customer please email us at info@bcsystems.com.au
Known for its iconic cliffs, roof-top bars and breathtaking river views, Kangaroo Point is a bustling inner-city precinct. As one of Brisbane’s oldest suburbs, it is also inevitably a spot where old meets new, as modern multi-story developments seamlessly mingle with some of the area’s most historic properties.
Nestled in the suburb’s eastern corner sits Thornclyffe House. Constructed in the late 1880s in the thick of the city’s first building boom, this significant historical landmark now has its own modern twist.
As part of the 2021 Thornclyffe Residences development, the property has become one of a 21-lot scheme, and now happily sits within the protective curve of a new 8-storey, 20-lot tower.
Thornclyffe House stands as a significant piece of Brisbane’s architectural heritage, dating back to the late 1880s. Built during the height of Brisbane’s first major building boom, the house reflects the prosperity and expansion of the city during that period. Originally constructed as a private residence, it showcased the Victorian-era grandeur and elegance that characterised many homes of the time – wide verandahs, ornate detailing and high ceilings. Topped of with its elevated position on the cliffs of Kangaroo point, offering panoramic views of the Brisbane River.
Today, as part of the Thornclyffe Residences development, the house represents a rare fusion of old-world charm and modern urban living. Its inclusion in the new residential scheme underscores the importance of preserving Brisbane’s architectural history while adapting to the evolving needs of the city.
For the most part, construction of the new residential tower was business as usual for developer Andrew Travers of Kenlynn. The devil, however, was in the detail when it came to the scheme’s structure.
BCsystems strata development consultant Michael Deane said, “Although Thornclyffe House may not have directly impacted the build of the new tower, it did require careful consideration when preparing the CMS (community management statement)”.
“Despite all lots being residential in nature, the heritage house is a vastly different product, so we needed to assess whether it should be included as a lot in the scheme or not.”
There were two options for the titling, Deane said. The first was a volumetric subdivision, separating the house from the tower entirely, and establishing an overarching building management statement [BMS] that would deal with the use and associated costs of any shared areas and facilities.
Although now a common concept, it adds an additional layer of complexity to the administration and management of the scheme, which Deane and Travers thought may deter prospective buyers of the free-standing house.
The second and preferred option was to simply include Thornclyffe house as a lot in the scheme. The owners would then become part of the broader Thornclyffe community, eliminating any ‘us and them’ issues.
“We thought this would be more appealing to potential buyers,” Deane said. “It did, however, mean the body corporate would be responsible for the maintenance of the newly constructed tower and the heritage house, with the scheme needing to be subdivided by building format plan.”
“This created its own challenge – how to fairly determine contribution schedule lot entitlements. Understandably there is a vast difference between the maintenance of a 130-year-old heritage-listed house and an apartment in the new tower.”
To fairly calculate the lot entitlements, BCsystems carried out a comprehensive analysis of how the tower lots and the heritage-house lot burdened the common property and consequently impacted costs.
“We gave regard to all the usual factors like the lot area and the number of potential occupants, but for this project, we also needed to consider the relevance of the costs. There would naturally be some that related to all lots in the scheme, and others that related only to the tower lots or the heritage house lot.
“We even commissioned two separate off-the-plan sinking fund forecasts—one for the tower and one for the heritage house, giving us the ability to allocate separate costs to the relevant lots in the calculations.
“Expenses like the anticipated painting costs for the tower were only attributed to the lots within the tower, and the anticipated painting costs of the heritage house were only allocated to the heritage house lot.”
The completion of the Thornclyffe Residences development created a remarkable blend of historic charm and modern luxury in the heart of Kangaroo Point. Consisting of 21 residential lots – 20 modern apartments in the newly constructed tower with the restored Thornclyffe House as its centrepiece.
The tower, designed with clean lines and expansive glass windows to maximise the stunning river and city views offers residents high-end finishes, open-plan layouts, and luxury amenities. Thornclyffe House itself has been thoughtfully updated to provide modern comforts while still preserving its historic character. The fusion of contemporary living spaces within the heritage framework offers a unique lifestyle opportunity for residents who value both history and modern convenience.
The two structures offer a striking contrast between old and new, seamlessly united by the shared facilities and common areas. Thornclyffe is a thoughtfully designed and curated development, fostering a cohesive and harmonious community living environment in the heart of Kangaroo Point.
“Act reasonably” is a phrase that appears throughout body corporate law. It’s a legal standard that applies to almost every decision a committee makes – enforcing by-laws, approving or refusing applications, spending scheme funds, engaging contractors, and resolving disputes between owners.
For many committees, a breakdown in communication with their body corporate manager is one of the first signs that expectations may no longer be aligned. When responses are slow, information is unclear or updates are inconsistent, committee members can start to question whether they have the support they need to manage the scheme effectively.